by Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse

This article was first published December 26, 2014, at

In the midst of all our preparations for our Christmas celebrations, something serious appeared on the horizon. A former Evangelical, Valerie Tarico, wrote an article on Salon called “Why rape is so intrinsic to religion.” With a title like that, the week before Christmas: one can only surmise that she intended to provoke.

I feel called to respond to this article, as a Roman Catholic woman intellectual. I know that I have many non-Catholic

Not a rape scene: Federico Barocci's Annunciaton, 1592
Not a rape scene: Federico Barocci’s Annunciation, 1592

readers among my Ruth Institute friends, but I have to speak as a Catholic for two reasons. First of all, that is what I am. Secondly, non-Catholic Christianity is not a well-defined thing. One can readily point to non-Catholic Christians who believe all sorts of things. There is no non-Catholic Christian “definitive” or “traditional” interpretation of anything. Say what you like. Believe what you like. But Catholicism has at least this virtue: one can figure out what it actually says and does not say.

Dr. Tarico cites numerous examples of rape stories in a variety of religious traditions: Zeus, Jupiter, Zoroaster and so on. Tucked away within those stories is the story of the virginal conception of Jesus in the womb of Mary. I’m reminded of the old Sesame Street song: “One of these is not like the others.”

Dr. Tarico suggests that Mary’s consent is more apparent than real. She uses a tendentious translation of Mary’s response to the Angel, “I am the bond slave of the Lord.”

But the original, even archaic translation continues to be part of the daily practice of Catholics around the world. Every day, three times a day, a 6 AM, 6 PM and at noon, people still say The Angelus prayer, which Catholics have been saying for hundreds of years. (We believe that Christopher Columbus and his sailors said this prayer daily on their voyages, for example.) This very Biblically-based prayer includes, “Behold the handmaiden of the Lord. Be it done unto me according to Thy Word.”

Thus, the idea that Mary freely gave her consent is deeply embedded into the Catholic mind. Nearly a thousand years ago, St. Bernard of Clairvaux captured the beautiful image of all creation, including Adam and Eve and all their descendants, waiting breathlessly for the Virgin’s answer to the Angel Gabriel.

Of course, no one is required to believe a sermon or poem written by a monk, no matter how privately holy or publically celebrated he may be. We Catholics make use of these kinds of writings as resources for meditation. These reflections of St. Bernard are among the many treasures of the Church that the Church permits, but does not require, us to use.

John Paul: "totally yours" totally dedicated his pontificate to Mary. Who is a slave to whom?
John Paul: “totally yours” totally dedicated his pontificate to Mary. Who is a slave to whom here?

A more definitive and more recent treatment comes from St. John Paul II’s 1987 Encyclical Redemptoris Mater, in English, The Mother of the Redeemer. Paragraph 13 emphasizes the traditional teaching that Mary gave her full consent to the angel’s message. John Paul ties his account to the dogmatic Catholic teaching that Mary was free from the stain of original sin, from the first moment of her conception. By this singular grace from God, she was in a position to be a “new Eve,” free from sin and able to completely conform herself to the will of God. In effect, Mary is God’s “do-over” from the Garden of Eden. This is why the Immaculate Conception has been so important to the Catholic Church that it was proclaimed as an official doctrine.

So Dr. Tarico is simply mistaken in holding that Mary’s consent was optional, that her “fiat” as we call it, was really the response of a slave. I cannot speak for all those who describe themselves as Christian. But I can say that this is definitive Catholic teaching.

But there is a deeper problem with the overall rhetorical strategy in this article. Dr. Tarico wants to speak of religion in general, and sweeps Christianity into a bucket with all sorts of religions. She is quite correct to see that in religion after religion, the gods come to earth and rape women. Indeed, this is part of the general pattern of the gods indulging themselves and doing what they like with humans.

Atheists sometimes sneer that “man creates god in his own image.” And so we do. Quite regularly, as a matter of fact.

And when we do create god in our own image, this is what we come up with: gods who rape, pillage, get drunk, get jealous, make war, and generally do whatever their superior power allows them to get away with. Alpha males love this kind of stuff. I believe that is why the patterns Dr. Tarico points out are so consistent across time and space. Elites of all societies love having religious sanction to use their power without restraint.

All except Christianity. In Christianity, God sends a gentle messenger to ask Mary to be the mother of His Son. The Angel Gabriel waits for her answer. She could have said no. In Christianity, God comes to earth, and allows us to do what we want to Him. We do the worst things we can think of, and He takes it. He triumphs over our worst sins, and over death itself.

Christianity most specifically says that the Elites do not get to do whatever they can get away with.

“One of these things is not like the others.” So unlike the others, that it is hard to imagine that someone just made it up. One might even reasonably suppose that God revealed Himself to us, since He knew we would not figure it out on our own.

The danger of attacking “religion in general” is that it undermines the one religion that has the potential to put the brakes on the rich and powerful. Indeed philosophers from Machiavelli to Nietzsche have understood as much. They hated Christianity precisely for the restraints it places on the Prince and the Uber Mensch. Sweep Christianity away, especially the Catholic version, and all that will be left standing is the paganism that Dr. Tarico rightly fears.

Dr. Tarico, you gave up Evangelicalism. Time to give up the atheism and paganism, which will not protect you and other people from the abuse of power. Dr. Tarico, you would make an awesome Catholic! Come on across the Tiber! You will be most welcome.

Join the Ruth Movement. Like us on Facebook. 

Comments are closed.