by 

Radical pro-choice rhetoric attacks the most basic facts of our human existence: that the human body comes in two different but complementary types, male and female. They cannot forgive women who embrace femininity rather than neuter themselves. (more…)

by  , Senior Fellow and Director of the Marriage and Religion Research Institute at the Family Research Council, and Ruth Institute Circle of Experts member.

This article was first published at The Public Discourse on March 11, 2013.

This year, the Supreme Court will render judgment on the institution of marriage. Though most of us don’t realize it, the Court first did so forty-one years ago in Eisenstadt v. Baird, a decision that gravely wounded marriage and set the nation on a course of gradual debilitation by ruling that states could not restrict the sale of contraceptives to unmarried people. (more…)

by Helen Alvaré

July 16, 2012 http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/07/5757

Against what social science tells us about human happiness, the government is promoting sexualityism–a commitment to uncommitted, unencumbered, inconsequential sex–as the answer. (more…)

 

by

First published February 23, 2012, at thepublicdiscourse.com.
Lawmakers must look past the “equality versus religious freedom” standoff, and consider the substantive merits of each particular case. (more…)

by Anne Morse

Should women suffering from anorexia take pills to suppress hunger? Should women suffering from fertility take pills to suppress babies? (more…)

Tagged with: